HuntNetwork Menu


New Page 2

Video Adverts

submitted by philipp on Sat May 18 2013 at 06:06am
Indianhead Ranch Outdoor Summer Camp

Views 4877
submitted by philipp on Sun May 5 2013 at 01:09am
African Feather, Fur & Scale Safaris

Views 4426
submitted by philipp on Fri Apr 26 2013 at 05:22pm
Stormberg Elangeni Safaris

Views 5341
submitted by philipp on Fri Apr 26 2013 at 06:50am
Chris Troskie Safaris

Views 4460
submitted by philipp on Fri Mar 29 2013 at 06:32am
Game Trackers Africa

Views 2924
submitted by philipp on Fri Feb 22 2013 at 05:12am
McDonald Safaris

Views 3069
submitted by philipp on Tue Feb 5 2013 at 04:58am
Phillip Bronkhorst Safaris

Views 4836
submitted by philipp on Fri Jan 11 2013 at 05:15am
East Cape Safaris

Views 3084
submitted by philipp on Fri Jan 4 2013 at 05:41pm
Schoonbee Safaris

Views 3615
submitted by philipp on Wed Dec 12 2012 at 05:45am
Fish'n'Crab Charters

Views 3065
submitted by philipp on Tue Dec 11 2012 at 05:09am
Blaauwkrantz Safaris

Views 3211
submitted by philipp on Mon Nov 5 2012 at 04:31am
Wild Footprint Safaris

Views 5225
submitted by philipp on Tue Oct 30 2012 at 06:34am
Baobab Jagd

Views 3282
submitted by philipp on Sat Oct 20 2012 at 05:39am
Nick Nolte Safaris

Views 3263
submitted by philipp on Wed Sep 26 2012 at 11:21pm
Dolphin Marine

Views 3325
submitted by philipp on Sat Jul 9 2011 at 05:13am
Tollie's African Safaris

Views 9402
submitted by philipp on Tue May 24 2011 at 11:17pm
McDonald Safaris

Views 5796
submitted by philipp on Tue May 24 2011 at 09:49pm
Baobab Jagd Namibia

Views 5404
submitted by philipp on Sun Nov 7 2010 at 04:02am
Sambar Hunt Victoria - Music by Steve Lee

Views 10182
submitted by philipp on Sun Nov 7 2010 at 04:01am
Aussie Challenge

Views 6174
submitted by philipp on Tue Jun 1 2010 at 11:10pm
Author Ron Thomson

Views 6341
submitted by philipp on Wed Nov 25 2009 at 06:34pm
Wild Country Adventures

Views 15307

McDonald Safaris

New Page 2

HuntNetwork Store

New Page 7

(1) 2 3 4 ... 581 »


on 2017/6/22 9:27:17 (7 reads)

The misleading, opportunistic, and inflated media reports that Stan Burger resigned as president of the Professional Hunters’ Association of South Africa (PHASA) earlier this week because he “reeled under the pressure of some captive-bred lion hunting supporters” are unfounded.
“PHASA acknowledges that our members have different and strong opinions on how the association’s resolution on the hunting of captive-bred lions (CBL) should be implemented, and that this has caused conflict within the association. This is, however, not the only reason that led to Stan’s resignation on 23 May,” says newly elected PHASA president, Dries van Coller.
The conflict [referred to above] may have caused some of the challenges that both PHASA and Stan had to endure, address, overcome and resolve during the past six months, “but these challenges are not putting PHASA’s CBL resolution in jeopardy in any away. This resolution still stands,” adds van Coller.
Stan’s reasons and motivations for resigning are not meant for public scrutiny and debate as it has to do with the manner in which the association and its members were governed in the past few months, and ought to be governed in the future.
Both Stan and PHASA have agreed not to discuss these details in the press because these matters are internal and personal, and have nothing to do with the future of well-regulated, responsible and legal hunting in South Africa.
“With that said, I need to clearly state that contrary to the inflated media reports that we have witnessed this week, PHASA is not going to dissolve nor are we about to heed to any “demands” that are not in the best interest of our members or in violation of PHASA’s constitution,” notes van Coller.
“Stan is a valued member of PHASA and the executive committee wishes him all of the best,” says van Coller.
He adds that PHASA will continue to safeguard, facilitate and promote the future of legal and sustainable trophy hunting as part of responsible conservation. “It is every hunter’s duty to ensure that whatever we do benefits Africa’s wildlife and contributes to the social-economic wellbeing of our communities,” concludes van Coller.
Other changes in PHASA leadership include the reinstatement of Barry York as vice-president.
MEDIA ENQUIRIES: or +27 83 353 6811

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News - Read More... | 3034 bytes more

Hunting News :  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

on 2017/6/20 11:01:32 (12 reads)

Safari Club International (SCI) today praised the appointment of Gregory Sheehan as Deputy Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Director Sheehan has served as the Director of the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources since 2012. He is a member of SCI and has been a key participant for several years at SCI's annual Western Directors' Forum at the SCI Convention.

He is an avid hunter and has hunted in the U.S. and in Africa. Director Sheehan is very familiar with many of the issues that affect SCI members and their abilities to hunt and participate in sustainable use conservation in the U.S. and abroad. He has served as Chair of the Threatened and Endangered Policy Committee of the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies and has been a member of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Federal/State Joint ESA Task Force. He also serves on the Board of the Council to Advance Hunting and Shooting Sports.

Director Sheehan has worked for 25 years in the natural resources and wildlife management community. In Utah, he championed a proactive approach to growing and sustaining wildlife populations. During his five years as Utah's Director, the state's mule deer population increased by more than 100,000 animals, leading to increased hunting and viewing opportunities for the public.

He is also a long-term advocate for shooting sports. Under his leadership the National Archery in the Schools program in Utah tripled its number of participants.

Director Sheehan earned his degree at Utah State University and later received a Masters in Business Administration. He and his wife have been married for 30 years and have two sons.

SCI welcomes Director Sheehan to Washington, D.C. and we look forward to working with him to address the domestic and international wildlife management and conservation concerns of SCI and the broader hunting community.

Source: ... fish-and-wildlife-service

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

Africa Hunting : European Union

on 2017/6/20 10:49:58 (8 reads)

Information received from SCI and IUCN.

NAPHA has been in contact with our Ministry of Environment & Tourism, who is following up on this at the highest level.

This week, 21 and 22 of June, the EU Member States will discuss a proposal by Germany to introduce severe restrictions on the importation of hunting trophies of non-threatened CITES species into the European Union (Annex B species). If adopted, the proposal will require EU hunters to obtain import permits for the importation of Annex B species into EU countries. This means that EU countries would have the ability to ban importation of these species simply by refusing to issue permits.

The discussions will take place in Brussels at the meeting of the EU Scientific Review Group on June 21st and the meeting of the Group of Experts of the Competent CITES Management Authorities on June 22nd.

Source: Namibia Professional Hunting Association (NAPHA)

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

USA Hunting : At South African hunting reserve, US bow hunters lie in wait for antelope and other wildlife

on 2015/9/2 17:20:00 (1501 reads)

OLIFANTSVALLEI, South Africa – One American bow and arrow hunter who traveled with his wife to a South African wildlife reserve worked as a state trooper for decades. Another hunter went alone after his closest friend, who was going to join him, died shortly before their date of departure from the United States.
The two retirees, who ended a 10-day hunt in August, operated separately in the dry winter scrub. They waited in concealed positions near watering holes or mineral licks for hours and, in adrenaline-fueled instances, killed wildlife with compound bows. By night, they dined on the meat of elands, impalas, warthogs and other animals in an African safari experience.
"I don't want to shoot animals that are young or that are of producing age. I'm looking for the older, more mature trophy animals," said 59-year-old Steve Schultz, a former law enforcement official from Park Falls, Wisconsin who chafed at negative views of hunters stemming from the July killing of a lion named Cecil that was lured out of a national park in Zimbabwe.
The "trophy" hunting industry in Africa has come under greater scrutiny since an American dentist shot Cecil, who wore a GPS collar and was being monitored by researchers, in an allegedly illegal hunt.
Stewart Dorrington, Schultz's South African host at Melorani Safaris, skipped euphemisms such as "harvesting" while describing where to shoot an animal so it dies quickly.
"You want to get into the chest cavity, that's where the vitals are," Dorrington said while escorting an Associated Press writer and photographer on a dirt-track drive around his 5,000-hectare (12,000-acre) reserve. He acknowledged detractors would find his choice of words "horrendous," but suggested critics should not gloss over the slaughter of farm livestock for food.
"I shot a nice red hartebeest," Jerry Emhoff, a resident of Watervliet, Michigan, said of one day's hunting. "It only ran a short distance and fell."
Emhoff, who used to sell and repair garage doors and gives hunting safety classes to children, meant that the animal's suffering was relatively short.
He turned 62 years old on Aug. 21, a bittersweet occasion because his longtime hunting companion, Larry Janke, died just before their planned trip to South Africa. Emhoff considered canceling the hunt, but Janke's wife and sister urged him to go.
Most of the thousands of foreign hunters who travel annually to South Africa are American, according to a national hunters' association based on the outskirts of Pretoria, the South African capital. Hunting with a bow and arrow was illegal in South Africa until the late 1980s, but its rising popularity in the United States spurred the South African market, according to Dorrington.
In 1986, the landowner turned his family's cattle ranch, a three-hour drive from Johannesburg, into a wildlife area. He hosts about two-dozen bow and arrow hunters a year. The business helps control the wildlife population and client payments contribute to the conservation of the herds, he said.
There are no lions, leopards or elephants there; it is illegal in any case to hunt elephants with a bow in South Africa.
Clients typically stay 10 days and shoot an average of six or seven animals whose parts may be shipped to their homes. European hunters tend to only mount horns while Americans often prefer the whole head as a wall trophy, according to Dorrington. He said Schultz and Emhoff just wanted the horns, a cheaper alternative.
Melorani Safaris clients pay a daily rate for lodging, the help of a professional hunter and other services. In addition, they pay $350 if they shoot a warthog and various prices for antelope species ($2,450 for a kudu and $7,500 for the rare sable). A buffalo goes for $12,500. The reserve also has zebras, giraffes and ostriches.
Clients pay a fee if they wound an animal. About 10 percent of animals are wounded in a hunt — some are tracked and killed while others recover from their injuries, Dorrington said.
Schultz's wife, Sharon, has joined her husband on hunts, reading, photographing wildlife and occasionally pointing out an animal that he might want to shoot. The couple runs a bear-hunting operation in Wisconsin.
Emhoff hunted in Africa with Janke in 2007. He was glad he went again despite initial misgivings after his friend's death.
"I can just hear him," said Emhoff, imagining his friend's voice. "'You've got to go, you've got to go, Jerry.'"

For more information read original article at: ... in-wait-for-antelope-and/

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

Africa Hunting : Africa’s elephant haven: Botswana a rare bright spot in dire battle against poachers

on 2014/8/5 9:10:00 (2716 reads)

Click to see original Image in a new window
CHOBE NATIONAL PARK, Botswana — No sign of an elephant in all of two minutes, a tourist teased a guide at Botswana’s Chobe National Park, home to tens of thousands of elephants. A minute later, their vehicle cleared a knot of shrubs and elephants loomed ahead beside the dusty road.
Such joking wouldn’t be possible in many other parts of Africa, where recent years have yielded dire news about ivory poaching. Poachers killed more than 20,000 elephants in 2013 amid rising demand for their tusks in Asia, particularly China, according to international conservation groups.
Botswana is a rare bright spot with estimates of its elephant population as high as 200,000. The southern African country’s political and economic stability, small human population and other factors make it an elephant haven, though pressure on habitats and conflict with the human population are increasing concerns.
Botswana is a challenging model for other African nations struggling to ward off the illegal wildlife trade, ranked by the United Nations alongside arms, drug and human trafficking because its illicit profits run into billions of dollars worldwide.
In all of Africa, there are about 420,000 to 650,000, according to some estimates.
Elephants roam widely outside conservation areas in landlocked Botswana, which has just 2 million people; in contrast, Kenya, under pressure from poachers, has almost as much territory as Botswana with about 35,000 elephants and 45 million people.
Elephants benefit from Botswana’s ban on commercial trophy hunting on state land that took effect this year to help other wildlife species whose numbers are in decline. Some elephants, who traditionally range across unfenced borders, may also have crossed into and stayed in Botswana as poaching escalated in neighbouring countries, some conservationists say.
While official corruption has hooks in African poaching, Transparency International in 2013 listed Botswana at 30th out of 177 countries and territories, based on how corrupt their public sector is perceived to be. It led all other African countries and was ahead of nations including Portugal, South Korea and Costa Rica in the survey by the Berlin-based watchdog group.
“Peace and conservation success go hand in hand,” said Rudi van Aarde, a South African conservationist at the University of Pretoria who studies regional elephant populations. “Warfare and unrest and improper governance go hand in hand with conservation failures.”
Botswana says its elephant population is growing at 5 per cent a year. Officials have introduced fencing to keep elephants away from villages, and the use of chili peppers is among schemes designed to protect crops from these “intelligent creatures,” said Cyril Taolo, deputy director of the country’s department of wildlife and national parks.
“Elephants being elephants, they quickly find their way around some of these things,” he said.
In December, Botswana President Ian Khama, speaking at an international meeting on elephant conservation in Gaborone, the capital, said that his government had deployed “all our security forces” to help guard against poachers.
But some suspects infiltrate across borders. In June, a Zambian poacher was killed in a gunfight with rangers in Chobe park in northern Botswana, which is close to Zambia, Zimbabwe, Namibia and Angola.
About 50 elephants have been poached annually in recent years in Botswana, according to Taolo.
Poaching statistics are far higher elsewhere in Africa. Poachers, some shooting from helicopters, killed about 70 elephants over a two-month period in Garamba National Park in Congo, in Central Africa, the park director said in June. Late last year, authorities in neighbouring Zimbabwe reported that more than 100 elephants were killed by cyanide poisoning in the western Hwange game reserve.
The carnage has drawn comparisons to an elephant slaughter in the 1970s and 1980s that only eased with an international ban on the ivory trade in 1989. Insurgent groups and organized crime syndicates are prominent in today’s killings, officials and analysts say.
“We’re going through that again, in a lot of ways,” George Wittemyer, an American expert who has studied elephants in Kenya, said in reference to the poaching surge decades ago. Wittemyer, an assistant professor at Colorado State University’s department of fish, wildlife, and conservation biology, said Kenya had made progress in combatting poachers, but acknowledged: “We’re definitely not anywhere near out of the woods yet.”
In Botswana’s Chobe park, elephants lumber and forage by the dozens close to the river, where they have stripped away much of the foliage. On a recent morning, an elephant swam to reeds in the river, its trunk aloft as its bulky body dipped through the water in a surprisingly fluid motion. Outside the park, a herd of elephants leisurely crossed a road near a town, seemingly unperturbed by passing cars.
Elephants Without Borders, a Botswana-based group, is leading what it describes as the biggest continent-wide, aerial census of elephants since the 1970s with funding from Microsoft co-founder and billionaire Paul Allen. The goal is to use the data to better marshal conservation efforts across Africa, said Mike Chase, the group’s director.
Elephants have “situational awareness” about risky areas, Chase said. He cited reports that many elephants entered Botswana during the Angolan civil war and some returned to Angola only when the war ended in 2002.
Taolo, the wildlife official, said Botswana recognizes that elephants are a global heritage and need international support: “Protecting those elephants comes at a real cost.”
The Associated Press
Read More: ... battle-against-poachers/?

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -


on 2014/5/21 19:09:57 (2725 reads)

The Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT) recently successfully released a pack of 15 Wild Dogs that had been illegally captured in Limpopo.
A farmer in the area had captured the free roaming dogs and held them in a boma on his farm. Because he was temporarily holding a group of seven female dogs on behalf of the EWT, he called Kelly Marnewick, the Manager of the EWT’s Carnivore Conservation Programme (EWT-CCP), and informed her that he had caught the canines. Ms Marnewick advised him that the best course of action for the dogs was to release the animals back into the wild immediately but the farmer was not satisfied with this option as he claimed the animals posed a danger to local game and livestock. He wanted the animals relocated elsewhere for release. It has not however, been established that these dogs were in fact causing any degree of conflict with local farmers and were in fact a threat to any livestock at all. Relocation of Wild Dogs is also not that simple and is not a viable course of action for four reasons.
• First, the population of Wild Dogs in the Waterberg is so small that removal of an entire group may push the population to extinction.
• Second, there are no protected areas in South Africa that have space for the dogs. There are currently eight reserves that house reintroduced Wild Dogs and these are all currently at capacity.
• Third, a larger pack of 15 dogs is more resilient than a pack of eight dogs. The reason is that if eight dogs in a pack of 15 are killed the pack can continue to breed and survive but if the pack is reduced to just eight members and even four of that eight die, the pack is likely to die out as breeding is no longer viable.
• And fourth, research has demonstrated that the relocation of animals does not resolve human-wildlife conflict. The only way to deal with conflict is by supporting landowners and helping them to implement non-lethal predator control such as the introduction of livestock guarding dogs.
It was also evident that the farmer wanted to breed with the dogs and undertake research that is not necessarily indicated for the future well-being of this Endangered species.
Ms Marnewick then spent the following weeks post this removal of the dogs from the wild working with the Limpopo Economic Development, Environment & Tourism (LEDET) to get the relevant permissions to collar and release the dogs back into their natural habitat, and arranged the veterinary assistance to support LEDET in the release. Despite the farmer not being in possession of any permits to have caught or kept these animals on his property, he refused to allow the EWT to remove the dogs from his camp. The EWT once more referred the matter to the LEDET and involved the Centre for Environmental Rights who encouraged all parties to ensure compliance with the relevant legislation that was drafted in order to protect the animals and act in the best interests of conservation. The dogs were finally seized by LEDET. A satellite collar was fitted to one of the dogs and genetic samples and identification photographs were taken from each dog. The entire pack was transported to an undisclosed venue in Limpopo province where they were released and their movements will be monitored via the satellite collar.
Said Ms Marnewick: "African Wild Dogs are protected in terms of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (Act 10 of 2004) and the Threatened or Protected Species Regulations of 2007 (ToPS). They are categorised as an Endangered Species (EN) – Indigenous species facing a high risk of extinction in the wild in the near future, although they are not critically endangered. The activities of capturing, transporting, hunting or killing ToPS listed species require a permit from the relevant conservation authority, and where no permits have been issued for such activities, it is deemed a crime."
Limpopo is one of the last remaining provinces in South Africa that still has free roaming Wild Dogs. This means that they were not reintroduced and did not escape from any fenced reserves, but rather they occur naturally outside of fenced reserves. Genetic testing conducted on the Waterberg Wild Dogs has demonstrated that they are genetically distinct from the Wild Dogs in the Kruger National Park and in other smaller reserves in South Africa. This makes this group of dogs critically important in a species that is on the verge of extinction. Because Wild Dogs occupy such vast ranges (each pack can range over more than 2,000 km2) it is extremely difficult to determine the population dynamics of Wild Dogs in the Waterberg. However, recent estimates put their numbers at between 3 to 4 packs of Wild Dogs left in the area with some smaller groups of dispersing animals.
"There are just 450 Wild Dogs left in South Africa and it is crucial that those remaining in the wild remain free roaming and protected. The pack that was captured and finally released constitutes more than 3% of the total remaining national population of this species. Conflict between carnivores and farmers over the killing of game is a reality in Limpopo but many farmers have chosen to implement conflict mitigation measures in partnership with the EWT such as the use of Livestock Guarding Dogs in the interests of being part of the movement to conserve this species and ensure its survival for future generations. The EWT works closely with a large number of farmers in the region and most have indicated no problems with the free roaming dogs at all. Most were in fact happy to see them released again," concluded Ms Marnewick.
If you know or hear about any activity that will bring harm to Wild Dogs, have any photographs or sighting details or require information about Wild Dogs and conflict mitigation measures that benefit farmers and carnivores please contact Derek on
The release operation was funded through the EWT’s Bosman Wild Dog Emergency Response Fund. We are also grateful to Dr Peter Caldwell and his team from Old Chapel Vet Clinic for their assistance and to Lampbert van der Westhuizen of West Dunes Aviation for being on standby with his chopper. Thanks too to the Centre for Environmental Rights for working to ensure that these dogs were released.
The EWT’s Wild Dog work in Limpopo is supported by Investec Properties, Jaguar-Land Rover South Africa, Land Rover Centurion, Vaughan de la Harpe, GCCL2 - Richard Bosman, Painted Wolf Wines, South African National Parks Honourary Rangers and IQ Business.
To read More:

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

African Fishing : Two Durban Fishermen injured by Marlin during competition

on 2014/4/29 14:50:00 (2687 reads)

Click to see original Image in a new window
Two South African anglers were seriously injured when a hooked marlin launched itself at their boat and smashed through its windscreen, officials said today.

It has emerged, on reflection of this incident, based on doctors findings of the injuries sustained, and based on the two injured men’s accounts of the incident, that the Marlin that jumped into the boat had impaled both men as it crashed over the boat.

It was at first suggested, when NSRI arrived on the scene, that the Marlins bill had impaled both men but this was later discounted by the skipper and his fellow crewman who were trying to make sense of what had actually happened in the incident which lasted only seconds before the Marlin disappeared back into the water over the back of the boat.

But on reflection of the incident by all 4 crewman and based on the extent and nature of the injuries it has been confirmed that severe injuries sustained to both fishermen were caused by the Marlin’s bill which impaled both men as it crashed through and over the boat.

The two injured fishermen are recovering in hospital.

See original media release below:

Clifford Ireland, NSRI Durban station commander, said: “At 11h45, Saturday, 26th April, NSRI Durban crew and Netcare 911 ambulance services, while on stand-by at the NSRI Durban sea rescue base for the Durban Ski-boat Festival, were activated following a request for urgent medical assistance from the 5.5 meter ski-boat MDUDUZE, for two crewmen seriously injured when a Marlin that was being fished using a line and rod jumped into the boat and over the back of the boat during the fishing competition, causing injuries to two of the crewmen, 2.5 nautical miles off-shore of Umdloti which is 12.5 nautical miles from the Port of Durban. There were 4 men on the boat at the time.

“The two men injured are a 35 year old crewman and a 33 year old crewman. Both are from Kloof, Durban. NSRI have not been given permission to release their names.

“According to skipper Marc Gieseler, of Durban, his 35 year old crewman was steering the boat at the time while Marc wrestled to reel in an approximately 140kg Marlin on his rod and line. On reeling the Marlin towards the boat the Marlin had launched out of the water in front of the boat and crashed over the front of the boat and then through the windscreen and the fin of the Marlin clipped the 35 year old man on the left side, chest and back torso, causing him to fall over backwards onto the 33 year old crewman who was then pushed backwards and on falling over backwards he had landed with his back on a fishing rod holder. The incident caused severe injuries to both crewman.

“The 35 year old crewman has a laceration to his back, de-gloving of his rib cage and laceration to his stomach, and the 33 year old crewman has a laceration and puncture wound to his shoulder and back.

“Our NSRI Durban volunteer sea rescue duty crew launched our sea rescue craft EIKOS RESCUER II and MEGAN II, accompanied by a Netcare 911 paramedic and responded. “On arrival on-scene both men were found to be in serious conditions.

“The boat was also found to have sustained extensive damage. “Both patients were transferred onto the sea rescue craft MEGAN II and both were medically treated by the Netcare 911 paramedic, assisted by our NSRI medics, and rushed to our sea rescue station where they were both transferred into a waiting Netcare 911 ambulance and transported to hospital in serious but stable conditions.

“Both crew members are in stable but serious condition in the Intensive Care Unit in hospital and are being cared for by hospital staff. Both men are expected to fully recover.

“The sea rescue craft EIKOS RESCUER II escorted the damaged casualty boat to the Port of Durban. “The skipper has confirmed that the Marlin went over the back of the boat and then disappeared back into the sea. “The sea rescue operation took just over an hour.”

To Read More: ... ring-fishing-competition/

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

USA Hunting : Virginia: Last Shipment of Elk from Kentucky to Virginia Furthers Reintroduction Efforts

on 2014/4/16 12:59:17 (2732 reads)

Click to see original Image in a new window
Last week, a group of 45 elk arrived in Virginia’s Buchanan County. The pack was the last transit of the animals from nearby Kentucky as part of Virginia’s Elk Management and Restoration Plan, which has a short-term goal of raising the state’s elk population to 400 individuals.
“Always when we get this close to getting them, we get excited,” Leon Boyd, a volunteer with the local chapter of the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF), told the Bristol Herald Courier. “Now that the weather has been better, folks want to get out and look for shed antlers, and we have noticed that counties want to bring kids from the school system over to see them. It’s always exciting to see other counties getting involved.”
The restoration program, which is funded by the RMEF, initially called for 75 elk to be relocated from Kentucky when it was launched in 2012. This latest group of elk to reach Virginia is by far the largest transported across state lines in the last three years, and will be joining a herd of about 30 animals already living in the state. Wildlife biologists are now keeping a careful eye on the elk, who have mostly stuck to the several thousand acres of of private and public land in Buchanan County allotted for their use.
This is not the first time that the state has tried to reintroduce elk. Virginia wildlife officials imported elk to 11 counties back in in 1916 in an attempt to restore a native population, but those releases failed. By 1926, only two small herds remained and managed to eek out an existence until the 1970s. By that time, disease and extreme isolation drove the elk once again out of the state.
Virginia used to be home to a vast number of elk, but habitat loss and unregulated hunting caused the species to become extirpated in the late 1800s. Drawing inspiration from successful restorations in Kentucky and other states, biologists are hopeful that this attempt will have lasting results.
The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries is considering bringing in elk to other counties as well. Wildlife officials say they are aiming for a sustainable population large enough to facilitate hunting within four years of the last release. Proceeds from the sale of hunting permits will go back into conservation efforts for the elk.
“What we’re going to do now is manage them,” Boyd said. “One way to do that is make elk meadows, where we actively plant forage that’s attractive to them and then they’ll tend to stay in that area [...] Our management of elk will be more focused on habitat.”
to read more go to:

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

Africa Hunting : Is it legal to use a silencer when hunting in South Africa?

on 2017/6/22 9:23:13 (7 reads)

June 2014, PHASA enquired from provinces regarding the legal use of silencers for hunting. Summary below:

Gauteng Ordinance 12 of 1983 does not prohibit the use of a silencer for hunting. It is therefore not illegal.

Legislation does not refer to silencers or sound suppressors. They are therefore not prohibited methods.

Northern Cape:
In the NCNCA 9/2009 a silencer is listed as a prohibited Hunting Method or Instrument BUT with the standard provision that it can be used if permitted by the landowner. IN SHORT - it will be illegal to use on a public road but legal to use during a legal hunt the moment the landowners signs the written permission document

Free State:
There is no legislation in place regarding the use of silencers in the Free State. In short, it is not prohibited to make use of a silencer during a hunt.

Current conservation legislation in Mpumalanga does not allow for the use of a suppressor/silencer without a permit, however we believe it is outdated and we will amend our Act and Regulations accordingly when the opportunity presents itself.

Mpumalanga Nature Conservation Act, Act 10 of 1998. Art. 11(f)

Eastern Cape:
Not illegal to use a silencer on a rifle.

LEMA do not prohibit the use of a silencer on a gun when hunting. Please read Art 38 in LEMA to get clarity.

It is advised that the hunter obtain permission/find out from the farm owner if he allows silencers on his property or not.

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News - Read More... | 1934 bytes more

Articles : Namibia

on 2017/6/20 10:56:29 (6 reads)

Windhoek — The newly signed Nature Conservation Amendment Act will empower the Ministry of Home Affairs and Immigration to ban entry into Namibia of foreign nationals involved in wildlife crimes related to the possession and dealing in elephant and rhino products, after they serve their prison terms.

This was announced by the Deputy Minister of Environment and Tourism, Tommy Nambahu, last Friday during the wildlife trafficking workshop organized by the Embassy of the People's Republic of China in Windhoek. Nambahu said the Act empowers the home affairs ministry to ban such individuals because the majority of culprits found guilty of illegal wildlife trading are foreigners, in particular Chinese nationals.

He said the current penalties for wildlife crimes are not sufficient deterrents, especially taking into account that trade and possession often involve foreign kingpins who are able to easily pay their way out of these fines.

It was the second wildlife trafficking workshop organized by the Chinese embassy to create awareness among local Chinese nationals in order to reduce trafficking of ivory and other threatened wildlife involving its nationals.

Nambahu's announcement coincided with President Hage Geingob signing the Nature Conservation Amendment Act into law at State House on Friday.

The Act seeks to increase fines for rhino and elephant poachers from the current maximum of N$200,000 to N$25 million.

The Act is aimed at urgently curbing rhino and elephant poaching, which have drastically increased in Namibia.

According to the Act, if found illegally with specially protected species a person will be fined N$10 million from the current N$20,000 and imprisonment of five to ten years.

During the signing ceremony at State House, Geingob said the increased incidents of illegal poaching are a serious matter and must be dealt with accordingly.

"I therefore welcome the stiff sentences this Act provides," he said.

According to statistics, 135 elephant tusks and pieces and 36 rhino horns were seized by the authorities in 2016.

A further 21 elephant tusks and four rhino horns were confiscated by the state this year alone.

Moreover, Namibia has been involved in two seizures of rhino horns, effected in South Africa and Hong Kong.

The Act also seeks to increase general penalties from the current maximum of N$250 to N$6,000 and imprisonment of three to six months for first time offenders.

Subsequent same offenders will be fined N$12,000 from the current maximum of N$500 and imprisonment of six to 12 months.

Fines for the illegal hunting of all protected species will increase from the current maximum of N$4,000 to N$500,000 and imprisonment of four to five years, while for that of all other species will increase from the current maximum of N$2,000 to N$500,000, and imprisonment of two to five years. Nambahu said the current levels of illegal trade and wildlife trafficking promote corruption, threaten peace and stability, strengthen illicit trade routes and destabilise economies.

He added that wildlife trafficking not only threaten the existence of iconic species but the very stability of the countries involved.

In addition, he said, wildlife trafficking has devastating impacts as it pushes species to the brink of extinction and threatens security, while undermining the rule of law and restricting economic development.

"It robs local communities of their natural resource base, including the economic benefits they derive from the legal sale of wildlife and hunting revenues. Combatting wildlife trafficking is not a short-term project; it is a long-term process with the guaranteed commitment from the government, private sectors, and of the communities that live with wildlife," he noted.

In addition, the amendment Act also increases fines for people who don't comply with the law regulating the possession and selling of wildlife, from N$8,000 to N$100,000, while jail time will be increased from two to 10 years.

He thanked the Chinese Government for their positive efforts and commitment to support Namibia to deal with wildlife crime, especially poaching and trafficking of wildlife products derived from species such as rhino and elephant.

He is hopeful that the awareness raising campaign and other measures by the Chinese government will bear fruit.

The Chinese enterprises living in Namibia created the Wildlife Trafficking Fund aimed to assist the Namibian government in fighting wildlife crime. The Chinese corporates living in Namibia donated N$100,000 towards the fund.

Source: ... ish-wildlife-traffickers/

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News - Read More... | 5188 bytes more

Africa Hunting :  Phasa Applauds SAA Decision To Lift Cargo Embargo On Certain Hunting Trophies

on 2015/9/2 21:20:00 (1528 reads)

The Professional Hunters Association of South Africa (PHASA) has welcomed the decision by South African Airways (SAA) to reverse the embargo it had effected on 21 April this year on the transportation of rhino, elephant, lion and tiger trophies on the carrier’s services worldwide.
Adri Kitshoff, chief executive, said that the reversal brought SAA’s directives regarding the transport of legally hunted trophies in line with the South African Government’s policy of “sustainable utilisation” of its natural resources.
Kitshoff expressed PHASA’s appreciation to the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) for their intervention in the matter as well as to SAA for the opportunity to meet with the carrier’s executives and to explain to them the importance of hunting to Africa’s economy and conservation programmes. She said that PHASA’s efforts to overturn the embargo through the direct negotiation with SAA, the DEA and Minister Edna Molewa since April had finally paid off.
Kitshoff said she is hopeful that other airlines and shipping lines that have refused to transport hunting trophies will follow SAA’s lead. “SAA has elected to fight the illicit trade in wildlife products through more stringent control methods instead of placing restrictions on the transport of legally hunted sport trophies. The same remedy is available to the other carriers,” she said.
“There is a clear distinction between illegal wildlife products, such as poached rhino horn or ivory, and legitimate hunting trophies. The export of trophies is strictly regulated by both the country of origin, the country of import and, where applicable, CITES.”
Published in PHASA Press Release

For more information, read the original article at: ... n=52&langu=1#.Veb6LPmqqko

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

USA Hunting : Hunters need to be aware of bogus forwarded emails

on 2014/8/25 17:57:01 (2561 reads)

Some time ago, I received an email from a well-meaning, but ill-informed, individual. (I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.) It was headlined – "Save your lead – Last lead smelting plant closed by Obama and the EPA."
The forwarded email had no date or original author, which is usually the case with this type of propaganda. It went on to detail that Obama was responsible for closing the last lead-smelting plant in the United States, and that this would lead to dire consequences for shooters, and hunters ("back-door gun control") and the entire U.S. economy.
A few quotes from the email: "Obama and the EPA just shut down the last lead smelting plant in the US. They raised the EPA regulations by 10 fold and it would have cost the plant $100 million to comply. You can own all the guns you want, but if you can’t get ammo, you are out of luck."
"All lead for bullets will have to come from overseas!"
"There are numerous alarming reasons why the US government and the military have been buying up all the ammo. Here’s one of them. The military’s obsession with ammo was related to security and supply. They knew this was coming, too, so they bought up all they could get before the plug was pulled."
"This move will also make the cost of low lead aviation fuel UNAFFORDABLE."
"Guns will be plentiful but ammo will be another story. How does $3.75 a round (that’s for one bullet) for a 9mm work for you? Box of 50 would only cost you $187.50."
I was taken aback by this email. How could I have missed this?! While researching my article about the .22 ammo shortage, I had recently spoken with representatives from three ammunition manufacturers and the National Shooting Sports Foundation – there was not a single mention of this "big news."
So, I did a little research. I encourage you to do the same. and several other websites clearly and factually detail the story – with links and references to company news releases, ammo makers, the National Rifle Association and the National Shooting Sports Foundation. Other than the fact that the smelting plant closed – nothing in the forwarded email (that originated in December 2013) proved to be true.
The Doe Run, Missouri, plant closed in December, 2013. As the company had announced the closing in 2010, this is not really "news" anymore. According to a company news release, "Doe Run supplied 8 to 10 percent of the U.S. demand for lead ...." Almost all of it was used for making batteries - not bullets!
According to several ammunition manufacturers and Sierra Bullets, the closing will have no effect on ammo availability or cost because most bullets are made from recycled lead, which is less expensive.
Why not blame Obama – everyone else does! What led to the plant's closure was a lawsuit by a Missouri environmental group, in response to lead dust in homes and elevated levels of the metal in yards and children’s blood. The action actually started when George Bush was president. Maybe the writer thought, What's a little lead in our children's blood if we can have bullets.
It has now been over six months since the plant's closure and jet fuel and ammo prices remain about the same. Why does this email continue to circulate? Take your pick:
A. The sender actually believes it.
B. The sender hates Obama and the EPA and does not care whether it is true or not.
C. It is a calculated effort by someone to discredit Obama and the EPA.
D. It is an effort by ammo makers to cause hoarding – which drives up the price.
The email that I received went on to declare, "There has not been a peep about this in the major news outlets ..."
This statement alone should be an alert to all thinking sportsmen and sportswomen. If no one in our very diverse media picks up the story – there must not be a story.
Digital media is wonderful, but it can provide an inexpensive and anonymous way for lies to be spread. These lies could be about hunting, trapping, wildlife management, fishing, shooting, or in this case, the supply of ammunition.
Please, if you get a forwarded email about anything, take time to check the facts before you send it to all of your friends. Doing otherwise just makes you part of the burgeoning problem and only hurts our outdoor sports.
Read more: ... f-bogus-forwarded-emails/

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

Articles : Beloved African Elephant Killed for Ivory—"Monumental" Loss

on 2014/7/3 17:20:00 (2182 reads)

Click to see original Image in a new window
One of Kenya's most adored elephants, who had giant tusks and was known as Satao, has been killed for his ivory—a "monumental" loss, experts say.
Poachers shot the bull elephant with a poisoned arrow in Tsavo East National Park, waited for him to die a painful death, and hacked off his face to remove his ivory, according to the Tsavo Trust, an area nonprofit that works with wildlife and local communities.
Satao was particularly appealing to poachers as a tusker, a type of male elephant with a genetic makeup that produces unusually large tusks. His tusks were more than 6.5 feet (2 meters) long.
"Kenya as a country contains probably the last remaining big tuskers in the world," said Paula Kahumbu, a Kenya-based wildlife conservationist with the nonprofit WildlifeDirect. (Read Kahumbu's essay on Satao's death in the Guardian.)
"To lose an animal like Satao is a massive loss to Kenya. He was a major tourist attraction to that part of Tsavo," said Kahumbu, who was a 2011 National Geographic Emerging Explorer.
The elephant was killed May 30, but members of the trust announced his death on June 13, after verifying the carcass's identity. (Related: "Efforts to Curb Ivory Trafficking Spreading, but Killing Continues.")
"It is with enormous regret that we confirm there is no doubt that Satao is dead, killed by an ivory poacher's poisoned arrow to feed the seemingly insatiable demand for ivory in far-off countries," the Tsavo Trust said in a statement.
"A great life lost so that someone far away can have a trinket on their mantelpiece." (Read "Blood Ivory" in National Geographic Magazine)
To read more ... d-animals-africa-science/

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

USA Hunting : Wisconsin hunter bags five-bearded turkey

on 2014/5/16 16:30:00 (2573 reads)

Ever shoot a gobbler with a beard measuring 31 1⁄8 inches?

Odds are way better than even that no Wisconsin turkey hunter has ever done that.

However, Ryan Tichenor, of Sparta, did shoot a gobbler with five beards that totaled 31 1⁄8 inches.

That happened April 23 during Wisconsin’s second turkey season in Monroe County and Zone 1. Tichenor was hunting alone that day when he shot the five-bearded bird at 2:30 p.m., but he had been in contact with that gobbler and three others all day long.

“I had four turkeys gobbling all day long – from 7 a.m. on. At about 11 a.m. a tom came in strutting, saw the decoy, and ran away,” Tichenor said. “Later, a jake came in, then a jake with a hen and the five-bearded tom. I watched them for about a half hour. That’s how long it took them to get into range.”

As Tichenor watched the gobbler come into range, and even right after he shot it, he didn’t realize the tom was sporting five beards. That discovery came after he walked up to the bird and noticed a second beard as he tagged the gobbler.

“I had no clue until after I shot it. I saw the second beard, tagged him, walked back to truck with the bird, and then saw four beards. When I separated the feathers and beards, I saw the fifth one,” he said.

The five beards reached a total of 31 1⁄8 inches with the following beard lengths: 10 1⁄4 inches, 6 1⁄8, 6 3⁄8, 4 1⁄2, and 3 7⁄8.

The bird weighed 20 pounds and had 3⁄4-inch spurs – likely a 2-year-old bird.

This is just Tichenor’s fourth year of turkey hunting. A family friend took him out when he was 16, the same age at which he tried hunting deer with a bow and gun.

“It had been 12 years since I had gone (turkey hunting) again because of work and school. I started again a few years ago. This is only the second turkey that I’ve called in and shot,” said Tichenor, who works for Handishop Industries, a nonprofit business development organization.

“I might buy a couple of extra tags for the fourth and fifth seasons,” he said.

So, at first glance, a person might think that 31 1⁄8 inches of beard should set some sort of record, right? Not so.

The National Wild Turkey Federation charts typical and nontypical turkey records by weight, beard length, and spur length. Any turkey with more than one beard is considered a nontypical bird.

The longest total beard length record belongs to a Wisconsin bird that also ranks as NWTF’s No. 1 nontypical record.

Wisconsin’s John E. Fryatt shot an eight-bearded bird in Richland County on April 19, 1989. Total beard length was 70.8750 inches. The bird weighed 22 1⁄4 pounds and had 1 1⁄2-inch spurs. Fryatt’s bird scored 194 total points and still stands as the No. 1 NWTF nontypical bird.

The most beards? That would be nine, and also from a Wisconsin bird. Steven D. Bock shot a nine-bearded Sauk County bird on May 11, 1995 that still ranks No. 2 on the NWTF nontypical list at 193.75 points. Total beard length was 72.6875 inches. That bird weighed 24 pounds; its spurs were 1.25 and 1.1875 inches.

To Read more: ... ter-bags-five-bearded-tom

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

USA Hunting : Madison: Remington Arms announces voluntary recall affecting Model 700 and Model Seven rifles

on 2014/4/16 13:10:25 (2859 reads)

Click to see original Image in a new window Remington Arms Company, on Friday announced a voluntary recall of Model 700 and Model Seven rifles with X-Mark Pro (“XMP”) triggers, manufactured from May 1, 2006 to April 9, 2014.

In a press release, Remington said that its senior engineers determined that some Model 700 and Model Seven rifles with XMP triggers could, under certain circumstances, unintentionally discharge. In the interest of safety, Remington said, the products are being recalled.

Remington’s investigation determined that some XMP triggers might have excess bonding agent used in the assembly process, which could cause an unintentional discharge. Therefore, Remington is recalling all affected products to fully inspect and clean the XMP triggers with a specialized process.

Remington has advised customers to immediately cease use of recalled rifles and return them to Remington free of charge. The rifles will be inspected, specialty cleaned, tested, and returned as soon as possible.

The press release urged owners to not attempt to diagnose or repair recalled rifles. Remington established a dedicated website and toll-free hotline to help consumers determine whether their Model 700 or Model Seven rifle(s) are subject to recall:

• Website
• Toll-Free Hotline: 1-800-243-9700 (Prompt #3 then Prompt #1) Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. EDT.

The website and hotline provide guidance on returning recalled rifles free of charge.

“Remington takes safety extremely seriously,” said Teddy Novin, director of public affairs and communications. “While we have the utmost confidence in the design of the XMP trigger, we are undertaking this recall in the interest of customer safety, to remove any potential excess bonding agent applied in the assembly process. We have established significant safety and technical resources to determine which rifles are affected and to minimize any risks. Our goal is to have every recalled firearm inspected, specialty cleaned, tested and returned as soon as possible.”

“We’re putting our customers and their safety first by voluntarily recalling all potentially affected rifles,” Novin concluded.
To read more:

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

Fish"n"Crab Charters

New Page 1




Remember me

Lost Password?

Register now!


Hunting Photos

Buffalo Bull Gravel... (2015/9/2)
Buffalo Bull Gravel...
Crocodile (2014/1/30)
Elephant (2014/1/30)
Bear Hunting (2013/8/20)
Bear Hunting
Roebucks in Romania (2013/6/11)
Roebucks in Romania
Hippo (2013/6/7)
Eland - South Afric... (2013/6/5)
Eland - South Afric...

Fishing Photos

Mozambique: Bazarot... (2013/10/29)
Mozambique: Bazarot...
Mozambique: Bazarut... (2013/10/21)
Mozambique: Bazarut...
no title (2013/9/20)
no title
Mozambique: Wave Wa... (2013/8/16)
Mozambique: Wave Wa...
Marlin Fishing (2013/8/14)
Marlin Fishing
Mackrel (2013/6/30)